Shyam Keshav Rokhande vs Chief Officer Municipal Corporation — 21/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96 Order 41 Rule 1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th May 2026.
M.J.Cases
CNR: MHBU110006722024
e-Filing Number
27-06-2024
Filing Number
314/2024
Filing Date
02-07-2024
Registration No
21/2024
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shyam Keshav Rokhande
Adv. SK BISMILLAH SK KARAMAT
Naresh Mohanlal Hargunani
Adv. SK BISMILLAH SK KARAMAT
Bhagwan Vishnu Pandav
Adv. SK BISMILLAH SK KARAMAT
Nitin Suryakant Kharade
Adv. SK BISMILLAH SK KARAMAT
Shridhar Omkar Burukale
Adv. SK BISMILLAH SK KARAMAT
Respondent(s)
Chief Officer Municipal Corporation
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Arguments
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Order |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Judge of Malkapur granted the applicants' plea for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a lower court judgment dated 18/04/2024, accepting that the 17-day delay was caused by one applicant's pilgrimage to Char Dham and inability to promptly inform counsel. The court condoned the delay on the condition that the applicants pay ₹1,000 as costs to the respondent within two weeks, after which the appeal will be registered for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The District Judge of Malkapur granted the applicants' plea for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a lower court judgment dated 18/04/2024, accepting that the 17-day delay was caused by one applicant's pilgrimage to Char Dham and inability to promptly inform counsel. The court condoned the delay on the condition that the applicants pay ₹1,000 as costs to the respondent within two weeks, after which the appeal will be registered for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts