Shyam Keshav Rokhande vs Chief Officer Municipal Corporation — 21/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96 Order 41 Rule 1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th May 2026.

M.J.Cases

CNR: MHBU110006722024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-06-2024

Filing Number

314/2024

Filing Date

02-07-2024

Registration No

21/2024

Registration Date

03-07-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur

Judge

1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96 Order 41 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

Shyam Keshav Rokhande

Adv. SK BISMILLAH SK KARAMAT

Naresh Mohanlal Hargunani

Adv. SK BISMILLAH SK KARAMAT

Bhagwan Vishnu Pandav

Adv. SK BISMILLAH SK KARAMAT

Nitin Suryakant Kharade

Adv. SK BISMILLAH SK KARAMAT

Shridhar Omkar Burukale

Adv. SK BISMILLAH SK KARAMAT

Respondent(s)

Chief Officer Municipal Corporation

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

06-05-2026

Disposed

22-04-2026

Order

08-04-2026

Arguments

18-03-2026

Arguments

11-03-2026

Defence Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

The District Judge of Malkapur granted the applicants' plea for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a lower court judgment dated 18/04/2024, accepting that the 17-day delay was caused by one applicant's pilgrimage to Char Dham and inability to promptly inform counsel. The court condoned the delay on the condition that the applicants pay ₹1,000 as costs to the respondent within two weeks, after which the appeal will be registered for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judge of Malkapur granted the applicants' plea for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a lower court judgment dated 18/04/2024, accepting that the 17-day delay was caused by one applicant's pilgrimage to Char Dham and inability to promptly inform counsel. The court condoned the delay on the condition that the applicants pay ₹1,000 as costs to the respondent within two weeks, after which the appeal will be registered for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case