Sharada Kisan Borade vs M/s Sollar Industries India Ltd., Bajargaon Tq. Katol Dist. Nagpur Advocate - Patil MS — 221/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,140. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 08th April 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHBU110006102021
Filing Number
232/2021
Filing Date
04-02-2021
Registration No
221/2021
Registration Date
04-02-2021
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sharada Kisan Borade
Adv. Rawal HM
Ashwini Kisan Borade
Gaurav Kisan Borade
Aarti Kantilal Ingale
Durgabai Sugdeo Borade
Respondent(s)
M/s Sollar Industries India Ltd., Bajargaon Tq. Katol Dist. Nagpur Advocate - Patil MS
United India Insurance Com.Khamgaon Dist. Buldana
Adv. Chavan DS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Malkapur, awarded compensation of ₹16,68,750 to the claimants (wife, children, and mother of the deceased) in a fatal road accident case. The tribunal held the insurance company (defendant no. 2) liable for full compensation, rejecting arguments that both vehicles shared fault, and calculated damages based on the deceased's imputed monthly income of ₹9,000, his age (40 years), and the number of dependents, plus additional amounts for loss of estate and funeral expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Malkapur, awarded compensation of ₹16,68,750 to the claimants (wife, children, and mother of the deceased) in a fatal road accident case. The tribunal held the insurance company (defendant no. 2) liable for full compensation, rejecting arguments that both vehicles shared fault, and calculated damages based on the deceased's imputed monthly income of ₹9,000, his age (40 years), and the number of dependents, plus additional amounts for loss of estate and funeral expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts