Varsha Natthu Chaudhari vs M/s Sollar Industries India Ltd., Bajargaon Tq. Katol Dist. Nagpur Advocate - Patil MS — 220/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,140. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 08th April 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHBU110006082021
Filing Number
231/2021
Filing Date
04-02-2021
Registration No
220/2021
Registration Date
04-02-2021
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Varsha Natthu Chaudhari
Adv. Rawal HM
Rohit Natthu Chaudhari
Dhanashri Natthu Chaudhari
Waman Vithoba Chaudhari
Respondent(s)
M/s Sollar Industries India Ltd., Bajargaon Tq. Katol Dist. Nagpur Advocate - Patil MS
United India Insurance Com.Khamgaon
Adv. Chavan DS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Malkapur awarded compensation of Rs. 15,67,500 to the claimants (wife, two children, and mother of the deceased Nathhu Chaudhary) who died in a road collision on May 20, 2019. The tribunal held the insurance company of the container vehicle liable for the accident caused by the driver's rash and negligent driving, rejecting the defendants' arguments that the Maxima vehicle driver was also at fault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Malkapur awarded compensation of Rs. 15,67,500 to the claimants (wife, two children, and mother of the deceased Nathhu Chaudhary) who died in a road collision on May 20, 2019. The tribunal held the insurance company of the container vehicle liable for the accident caused by the driver's rash and negligent driving, rejecting the defendants' arguments that the Maxima vehicle driver was also at fault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts