Mohan Gopaldas Duseja vs Pradhyumanbhai Bipinbhai Boricha Advocate - Nikam RM — 170/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,140. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHBU110005702021
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
212/2021
Filing Date
04-02-2021
Registration No
170/2021
Registration Date
04-02-2021
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohan Gopaldas Duseja
Adv. Tawari BK
Roshani Mohandas Duseja
Naina Mohandas Duseja
Sahil Mohandas Duseja
Respondent(s)
Pradhyumanbhai Bipinbhai Boricha Advocate - Nikam RM
Sunil Kalicharan Gawai
Adv. Nikam RM
Royal Sundaram General Insurance company Ltd., Chennani
Adv. Pande BB
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
Compliance
Compliance
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 13-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In MACP No.170/2021 (Mohan + 3 v/s. Pradhyumanbhai + 2), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the petitioners' application (Exh.69) for production and exhibition of documents. The court admitted verified copies of payment receipts and letters from the Transport Commissioner regarding the motor vehicle in question as Exhibits 71 and 72, finding the documents were not substantially disputed. The application was disposed of accordingly on 19.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In MACP No.170/2021 (Mohan + 3 v/s. Pradhyumanbhai + 2), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the petitioners' application (Exh.69) for production and exhibition of documents. The court admitted verified copies of payment receipts and letters from the Transport Commissioner regarding the motor vehicle in question as Exhibits 71 and 72, finding the documents were not substantially disputed. The application was disposed of accordingly on 19.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts