Ashvini Balkrushna Tayade vs Raju Rama Choudhari Advocate - Pande BB — 103/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 08th May 2026.

M.A.C.P.

CNR: MHBU110004562021

Case disposed

Filing Number

166/2021

Filing Date

04-02-2021

Registration No

103/2021

Registration Date

04-02-2021

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur

Judge

2-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Ashvini Balkrushna Tayade

Adv. Rawal HM

ku. Swarali Balkrushna Tayade

Prabhavati Pralhad Tayade

Pralhad Mallhari Tayade

Shivaji Pralhad Tayade

Respondent(s)

Raju Rama Choudhari Advocate - Pande BB

S.B.I. General Insurance Co.ltd.,

Adv. Parihar BB

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

08-05-2026

Disposed

07-05-2026

Arguments

06-05-2026

Arguments

05-05-2026

Arguments

27-04-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

08-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 28,30,800 in compensation to the legal heirs of Balkrushna Pralhad Tayade, who died in a motor vehicle accident on October 8, 2015, caused by rash and negligent driving of a truck. The court rejected the insurance company's defenses regarding the driver's license validity and the deceased's contributory negligence, finding the truck's liability established through FIR and charge-sheet evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

17-08-2022
Evidence
19-10-2022
Evidence
19-10-2022
Evidence
04-10-2023
Evidence
07-08-2024
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 28,30,800 in compensation to the legal heirs of Balkrushna Pralhad Tayade, who died in a motor vehicle accident on October 8, 2015, caused by rash and negligent driving of a truck. The court rejected the insurance company's defenses regarding the driver's license validity and the deceased's contributory negligence, finding the truck's liability established through FIR and charge-sheet evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case