Shaikh Rashid Shaikh Munaf vs Sarfaraz Khan Himmat Khan — 48/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHBU110004162022
Filing Number
206/2022
Filing Date
16-Jun-2022
Registration No
48/2022
Registration Date
16-Jun-2022
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur
Judge
2-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shaikh Rashid Shaikh Munaf
Adv. khillare J.P.
-
2.Nasreenbi Shaikh Rashid
-
3.Shirin Alnas Shaikh Rashid
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sarfaraz Khan Himmat Khan
-
2.Santosh Pralhad Thombre
-
3.Reliance General Insurance Com.Ltd.
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
07-May-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
22-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
04-Feb-2025
Lok-Nyayalaya
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
14-Dec-2024
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
11-Dec-2024
Lok-Nyayalaya
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
23-Oct-2024
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2024
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
26-Jun-2024
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
05-May-2024
Lok-Nyayalaya
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2024
Lok-Nyayalaya
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2024
Issues
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2024
Issues
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2024
Lok-Nyayalaya
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
31-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
13-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
08-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
25-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
09-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
09-Aug-2023
Lok-Nyayalaya
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
26-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
20-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
16-Jun-2023
Notice_Unready
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2023
Notice_Unready
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2023
Notice_Unready
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2023
Lok-Nyayalaya
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
04-Nov-2022
Awaiting Notice
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
29-Aug-2022
Awaiting Notice
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
18-Jun-2022
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Malkapur granted the application for court fee exemption filed by Sk. Rashid and Sarfaraz Khan under Rule 257(3) of the Maharashtra Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989. The applicants, who lost their sole earning member due to death, were exempted from paying court fees due to financial hardship. However, they must pay the prescribed fees before receiving compensation, notwithstanding the exemption granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 48/2022
Summary: The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Malkapur granted the application for court fee exemption filed by Sk. Rashid and Sarfaraz Khan under Rule 257(3) of the Maharashtra Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989. The applicants, who lost their sole earning member due to death, were exempted from paying court fees due to financial hardship. However, they must pay the prescribed fees before receiving compensation, notwithstanding the exemption granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts