Rukhmabai Raghunath Vaitkar vs Anil Jagannath Ingale — 27/2023
Case under Central Motor Vehicle Rules Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHBU110002482023
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
06-05-2023
Filing Number
59/2023
Filing Date
06-05-2023
Registration No
27/2023
Registration Date
08-05-2023
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rukhmabai Raghunath Vaitkar
Adv. PARMAR KEWALSINGH VIJAYSINGH
Raghunath Sadashiv Vaitkar
Adv. PARMAR KEWALSINGH VIJAYSINGH
Poonam Raghunath Vaitkar
Adv. PARMAR KEWALSINGH VIJAYSINGH
Vitthal Raghunath Vaitkar
Adv. PARMAR KEWALSINGH VIJAYSINGH
Hariom Raghunath Vaitkar
Adv. PARMAR KEWALSINGH VIJAYSINGH
Respondent(s)
Anil Jagannath Ingale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 29-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In MACP No.27/2023 (Rukhmabai + 4 v/s. Anil + 1), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Malkapur ordered on 20.8.2025 that the case shall proceed without the written statement of Respondent No.2, who appeared but failed to file it despite multiple opportunities granted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In MACP No.27/2023 (Rukhmabai + 4 v/s. Anil + 1), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Malkapur ordered on 20.8.2025 that the case shall proceed without the written statement of Respondent No.2, who appeared but failed to file it despite multiple opportunities granted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts