Mangaldas Lakshman Pawar vs State of Maharashtra through police station MIDC Malkapur through app Malkapur — 57/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU110002142026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
126/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
57/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur
Judge
2-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mangaldas Lakshman Pawar
Adv. Shaikh SA
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through police station MIDC Malkapur through app (Assistant Public Prosecutor) Malkapur
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Malkapur, granted bail to Mangaldas Lakshman Pawar, arrested for possessing prohibited food articles (Pan Masala, Scented Tobacco, Gutkha) valued at Rs. 2,87,568. The court found that while Section 123 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita carries up to 10 years imprisonment, the Food Safety and Standards Act charges carry only 6 months punishment—making the offences bailable. The court noted the accused had no criminal antecedents, investigation was complete, and evidence was seized, warranting bail on personal recognizance and Rs. 50,000 surety with conditions against tampering with witnesses and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Malkapur, granted bail to Mangaldas Lakshman Pawar, arrested for possessing prohibited food articles (Pan Masala, Scented Tobacco, Gutkha) valued at Rs. 2,87,568. The court found that while Section 123 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita carries up to 10 years imprisonment, the Food Safety and Standards Act charges carry only 6 months punishment—making the offences bailable. The court noted the accused had no criminal antecedents, investigation was complete, and evidence was seized, warranting bail on personal recognizance and Rs. 50,000 surety with conditions against tampering with witnesses and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts