Kamalbai Kashinath Jagtap vs Vijay Yashwant Supe — 14/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Compromise. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Compromise Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.A.C.P.

CNR: MHBU110002092022

Filing Number

104/2022

Filing Date

28-Mar-2022

Registration No

14/2022

Registration Date

28-Mar-2022

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur

Judge

1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kamalbai Kashinath Jagtap

    Adv. Rawal HM

  2. 2.Kashinath Sandu Jagtap

    Adv. Rawal HM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Yashwant Supe

  2. 2.I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Com.Ltd.

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Compromise

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Compromise

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Compromise

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Compromise

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

  7. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

  8. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

  9. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

  10. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

  11. 18-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The MACT court allowed respondent No.2's application to set aside the "no written statement" (no W.S.) order dated 18.6.2025. Since the claimants did not object to the application, the court set aside the no W.S. order and admitted respondent No.2's written statement on record. The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

  13. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

  14. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge

  15. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge

  16. 13-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge

  17. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge

  18. 11-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  19. 08-May-2024

    IssuesView PDF

  20. 08-May-2024

    Evidence

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  21. 03-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  22. 17-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  23. 11-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  24. 05-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  25. 09-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  26. 08-Aug-2023

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  27. 30-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  28. 06-Apr-2023

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  29. 11-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  30. 21-Jan-2023

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  31. 07-Nov-2022

    Ex-Parte Order

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  32. 25-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

  33. 20-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

  34. 29-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 28-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The MACT court allowed respondent No.2's application to set aside the "no written statement" (no W.S.) order dated 18.6.2025. Since the claimants did not object to the application, the court set aside the no W.S. order and admitted respondent No.2's written statement on record. The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case