State of Maharashtra vs Mohan Shriram Vitokar Advocate - Kulkarni SG — 18/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),323,354,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHBU110001992024

Case disposed

Filing Number

114/2024

Filing Date

15-03-2024

Registration No

18/2024

Registration Date

15-03-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur

Judge

2-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

109

Police Station

Malkapur R

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),323,354,506,34

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Mohan Shriram Vitokar Advocate - Kulkarni SG

Shriram Bhikaji Vitokar

Kesarbai Shriram Vitokar

Gokulabai Shriram Vitokar

Gajanan Shriram Vitokar

Sharda Gajanan Vitokar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

07-03-2026

Evidence

21-02-2026

Evidence

31-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Malkapur acquitted all six accused persons of charges under IPC sections 498(A) (cruelty to married woman), 313 (causing miscarriage), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 354 (outraging modesty). The court found that the informant (wife) disowned her own FIR allegations during trial and declined to narrate the alleged incidents, showing hostility to the prosecution case and leaving insufficient evidence to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

19-08-2024
Charge
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Malkapur acquitted all six accused persons of charges under IPC sections 498(A) (cruelty to married woman), 313 (causing miscarriage), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 354 (outraging modesty). The court found that the informant (wife) disowned her own FIR allegations during trial and declined to narrate the alleged incidents, showing hostility to the prosecution case and leaving insufficient evidence to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case