State of Maharashtra vs Mohammad Shakil Mohammad Musa Advocate - Rawat SD — 12/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,332,341,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU110001632022
Filing Number
93/2022
Filing Date
09-Mar-2022
Registration No
12/2022
Registration Date
09-Mar-2022
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur
Judge
2-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 20-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
157
Police Station
Dhamangaon Badhe
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mohammad Shakil Mohammad Musa Advocate - Rawat SD
-
2.Mohammad Saddam Mohammd Alim
Adv. Rawat SD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Malkapur acquitted both accused (Mohammad Shakil Mohammad Musa and Mohammad Saddam Mohammad Alim) of charges under IPC Sections 353, 332, 341, and 506 r/w 34. The court found insufficient corroborated evidence that the informant was discharging his official duty as a forest guard when allegedly assaulted, and concluded the prosecution failed to prove the assault or threats beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Arguments
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
List of Witness
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
List of Witness
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
24-Jan-2025
Hearing Before Charge
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
Hearing Before Charge
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2024
Hearing Before Charge
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
19-Jul-2024
Hearing Before Charge
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
08-May-2024
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
03-Feb-2024
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
06-Nov-2023
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
19-Aug-2023
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
06-Jun-2023
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
10-Mar-2023
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
14-Dec-2022
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
15-Sep-2022
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
20-Jun-2022
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
10-Mar-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2022
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Malkapur acquitted both accused (Mohammad Shakil Mohammad Musa and Mohammad Saddam Mohammad Alim) of charges under IPC Sections 353, 332, 341, and 506 r/w 34. The court found insufficient corroborated evidence that the informant was discharging his official duty as a forest guard when allegedly assaulted, and concluded the prosecution failed to prove the assault or threats beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts