Sant Muktai Vikas Farmer Producer Company Limited vs Mahatma Phule Magaswargiya Sahakari Soot Girani Ltd — 1073/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU100017032025

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

04th July 2026

e-Filing Number

11-07-2025

Filing Number

1549/2025

Filing Date

11-07-2025

Registration No

1073/2025

Registration Date

14-07-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malkapur

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Sant Muktai Vikas Farmer Producer Company Limited

Adv. Kaple U.V

Harshal OmPrakash Chaudhari

Adv. Kaple U.V

Respondent(s)

Mahatma Phule Magaswargiya Sahakari Soot Girani Ltd

Sanjay Chaugule

Raju Jaywant Awale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

13-05-2026

Awaiting Summons

29-04-2026

Order

23-03-2026

Order

11-03-2026

Order

04-03-2026

Order

Interim Orders

13-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the complaint and issued process against the accused for the offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (cheque dishonor). The court found prima facie that all ingredients of the offense were satisfied based on the documentary evidence and allegations presented. The matter was kept for inquiry under Section 225 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, since accused nos. 2 and 3 reside beyond the court's territorial jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the complaint and issued process against the accused for the offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (cheque dishonor). The court found prima facie that all ingredients of the offense were satisfied based on the documentary evidence and allegations presented. The matter was kept for inquiry under Section 225 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, since accused nos. 2 and 3 reside beyond the court's territorial jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malkapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case