State Excise Department Malkapur vs Mohan Dhyaneshwar Sambare Advocate - Ingle V.G — 642/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU100011762023
Filing Number
980/2023
Filing Date
09-08-2023
Registration No
642/2023
Registration Date
09-08-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malkapur
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Excise Department Malkapur
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mohan Dhyaneshwar Sambare Advocate - Ingle V.G
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 10-11-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Malkapur acquitted accused Mohan Rameshwar Sanbare of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(a) and (e) due to insufficient evidence. The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including the absence of a chemical analysis report to confirm the seized items (10 foreign liquor bottles and 27 plastic bottles of local alcohol) were actually alcohol, and the compromised integrity of the panchnama (formal seizure document) as one witness could not credibly establish its authenticity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Malkapur acquitted accused Mohan Rameshwar Sanbare of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(a) and (e) due to insufficient evidence. The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including the absence of a chemical analysis report to confirm the seized items (10 foreign liquor bottles and 27 plastic bottles of local alcohol) were actually alcohol, and the compromised integrity of the panchnama (formal seizure document) as one witness could not credibly establish its authenticity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts