State Excise Department Malkapur vs Mohan Dhyaneshwar Sambare Advocate - Ingle V.G — 642/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU100011762023

Case disposed

Filing Number

980/2023

Filing Date

09-08-2023

Registration No

642/2023

Registration Date

09-08-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malkapur

Judge

1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

State Excise Department Malkapur

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Mohan Dhyaneshwar Sambare Advocate - Ingle V.G

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.

11-03-2026

Disposed

11-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

16-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-12-2025

Evidence

10-11-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Malkapur acquitted accused Mohan Rameshwar Sanbare of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(a) and (e) due to insufficient evidence. The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including the absence of a chemical analysis report to confirm the seized items (10 foreign liquor bottles and 27 plastic bottles of local alcohol) were actually alcohol, and the compromised integrity of the panchnama (formal seizure document) as one witness could not credibly establish its authenticity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

08-08-2025
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Malkapur acquitted accused Mohan Rameshwar Sanbare of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(a) and (e) due to insufficient evidence. The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including the absence of a chemical analysis report to confirm the seized items (10 foreign liquor bottles and 27 plastic bottles of local alcohol) were actually alcohol, and the compromised integrity of the panchnama (formal seizure document) as one witness could not credibly establish its authenticity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Malkapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case