Harsha Prakash More vs Prakash Shubhash More — 17/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules Section 6 (5). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.
PWDVA Execution
CNR: MHBU100011622024
e-Filing Number
24-07-2024
Filing Number
1010/2024
Filing Date
07-Aug-2024
Registration No
17/2024
Registration Date
07-Aug-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malkapur
Judge
1-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Harsha Prakash More
Adv. CHORDIYA SANKET MOHANLAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prakash Shubhash More
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate dismissed PWDVA Execution No. 17/2024 (Harsha vs. Prakash) in default for want of prosecution. The court found that the applicant and her counsel repeatedly remained absent, failed to take steps since filing, and showed no justified reason for non-prosecution, thereby losing interest in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
02-Feb-2026
Dismissal Order
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
20-Dec-2025
Steps
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
06-Nov-2025
Steps
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
25-Sep-2025
Steps
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
14-Aug-2025
Steps
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
04-Jul-2025
Steps
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
03-Jun-2025
Steps
-
28-Apr-2025
Steps
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
27-Feb-2025
Steps
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
01-Jan-2025
Steps
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
26-Nov-2024
Steps
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
15-Oct-2024
Steps
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
12-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2024
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate dismissed PWDVA Execution No. 17/2024 (Harsha vs. Prakash) in default for want of prosecution. The court found that the applicant and her counsel repeatedly remained absent, failed to take steps since filing, and showed no justified reason for non-prosecution, thereby losing interest in the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts