Vasudev Pandri Bhagat vs Radhesham Maganlal Agrawal Advocate - Tarkase S. R. — 46/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHBU100008612023
e-Filing Number
17-06-2023
Filing Number
129/2023
Filing Date
21-Jun-2023
Registration No
46/2023
Registration Date
21-Jun-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Malkapur
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vasudev Pandri Bhagat
Adv. Kulkarni SG
Respondent(s)
-
1.Radhesham Maganlal Agrawal Advocate - Tarkase S. R.
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
18-Apr-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
31-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
04-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
24-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
07-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
20-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
07-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
17-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
04-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
27-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
12-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
28-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
14-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
16-Sep-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
20-Aug-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
16-Jul-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
21-Jun-2025
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
03-May-2025
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
22-Apr-2025
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
24-Mar-2025
Reply/Say
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
15-Mar-2025
Compromise
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
01-Mar-2025
Compromise
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
04-Feb-2025
Compromise
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
21-Jan-2025
Compromise
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
18-Dec-2024
Compromise
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
07-Dec-2024
Compromise
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
16-Nov-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
05-Nov-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
23-Oct-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
19-Oct-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
08-Oct-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
24-Sep-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
21-Aug-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
07-Aug-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
19-Jul-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
02-Jul-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
07-May-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
16-Apr-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
27-Mar-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
20-Mar-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
12-Mar-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
21-Feb-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
09-Feb-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court partially allowed the defendant's application for rejection of the plaint based on insufficient court fees. The plaintiff, seeking a declaration of title by adverse possession and perpetual injunction over a residential property valued at Rs. 5,10,750, had paid only Rs. 400 in court fees when Rs. 7,690 was required (one-half of ad valorem fee under Section 6(iv)(d) of Maharashtra Court Fees Act). The court directed the plaintiff to pay the deficit amount of Rs. 7,490 before the next date, failing which the plaint would be rejected. The suit was found maintainable before the court as the valuation for jurisdictional purposes was Rs. 2,55,375, within the court's pecuniary jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Feb-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
08-Feb-2024
Order
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
07-Feb-2024
Order
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
02-Feb-2024
Order
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
24-Jan-2024
Order
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
16-Jan-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
03-Jan-2024
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
06-Dec-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
05-Dec-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
07-Nov-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
30-Oct-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
11-Oct-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
04-Oct-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
30-Sep-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
13-Sep-2023
Hearing
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
22-Aug-2023
Written Statement
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
02-Aug-2023
Written Statement
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
25-Jul-2023
Written Statement
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
19-Jul-2023
Appearance
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
01-Jul-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
01-Jul-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
01-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.
-
26-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 46/2023
Summary: The court partially allowed the defendant's application for rejection of the plaint based on insufficient court fees. The plaintiff, seeking a declaration of title by adverse possession and perpetual injunction over a residential property valued at Rs. 5,10,750, had paid only Rs. 400 in court fees when Rs. 7,690 was required (one-half of ad valorem fee under Section 6(iv)(d) of Maharashtra Court Fees Act). The court directed the plaintiff to pay the deficit amount of Rs. 7,490 before the next date, failing which the plaint would be rejected. The suit was found maintainable before the court as the valuation for jurisdictional purposes was Rs. 2,55,375, within the court's pecuniary jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts