Salim Shah Mehbub Shah vs Shaikh Anis Shaikh Taher — 42/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Argument on Pre_Issues. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHBU090008192025
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
02-07-2025
Filing Number
157/2025
Filing Date
03-07-2025
Registration No
42/2025
Registration Date
03-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jalgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Salim Shah Mehbub Shah
Adv. MANKAR SANDEEP RAMESH
Rukhsana Bi Makbul Shah
Adv. MANKAR SANDEEP RAMESH
Respondent(s)
Shaikh Anis Shaikh Taher
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod
Argument on Pre_Issues
Argument on Pre_Issues
Argument on Pre_Issues
Argument on Pre_Issues
Argument on Pre_Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Argument on Pre_Issues |
| 11-03-2026 | Argument on Pre_Issues |
| 12-01-2026 | Argument on Pre_Issues |
| 05-11-2025 | Argument on Pre_Issues |
| 20-09-2025 | Argument on Pre_Issues |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Salim Shah vs. Sheikh Anis (RCS No. 42/2025) Court: Civil Judge (Jr.Dn), Jalgaon–Jamod Date: 20/09/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction GRANTED. The court allowed the plaintiffs' application and restrained the defendant from obstructing their use of a disputed cartway through agricultural land (Gut Nos. 222, 223, and 0.40 R in Gut No.202) until disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on sale deeds referencing the way and 40-50 years of continuous use, and determined the balance of convenience favored the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Salim Shah vs. Sheikh Anis (RCS No. 42/2025) Court: Civil Judge (Jr.Dn), Jalgaon–Jamod Date: 20/09/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction GRANTED. The court allowed the plaintiffs' application and restrained the defendant from obstructing their use of a disputed cartway through agricultural land (Gut Nos. 222, 223, and 0.40 R in Gut No.202) until disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on sale deeds referencing the way and 40-50 years of continuous use, and determined the balance of convenience favored the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts