State of Maharashtra vs Umesh Suresh Nivane Advocate - Gupta SA — 133/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,323,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHBU090006902019
Filing Number
624/2019
Filing Date
12-07-2019
Registration No
133/2019
Registration Date
12-07-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jalgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
207
Police Station
Jalgaon Jamod
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Umesh Suresh Nivane Advocate - Gupta SA
Manisha Umesh Nivane
Adv. Gupta SA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 133/2019, Jalgaon (Jamod) First Class Magistrate Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Umesh Suresh Nirvane and Manisha Umesh Nirvane) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 294, 323, 506 with section 34. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory witness testimony, lack of independent corroboration, and inconsistencies between the complainant's statement and actual evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 133/2019, Jalgaon (Jamod) First Class Magistrate Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Umesh Suresh Nirvane and Manisha Umesh Nirvane) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 294, 323, 506 with section 34. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory witness testimony, lack of independent corroboration, and inconsistencies between the complainant's statement and actual evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts