State of Maharashtra vs Sumitra Vijay Rajput — 294/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU090006462025

Filing Number

501/2025

Filing Date

13-May-2025

Registration No

294/2025

Registration Date

13-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jalgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

199

Police Station

Jalgaon Jamod

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sumitra Vijay Rajput

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalgaon Jamod, discharged accused Sumitra in a prosecution under Section 65-e of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing the accused's prolonged absence and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple summons and bail warrants. The court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita due to the case's indefinite pendency and lack of substantive progress, and ordered the seized 12 liters of hand-made liquor to be disposed by the Excise Department after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

  4. 20-Dec-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

  5. 08-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

  6. 14-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 294/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalgaon Jamod, discharged accused Sumitra in a prosecution under Section 65-e of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing the accused's prolonged absence and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple summons and bail warrants. The court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita due to the case's indefinite pendency and lack of substantive progress, and ordered the seized 12 liters of hand-made liquor to be disposed by the Excise Department after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case