State of Maharashtra vs Sumitra Vijay Rajput — 294/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU090006462025
Filing Number
501/2025
Filing Date
13-05-2025
Registration No
294/2025
Registration Date
13-05-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jalgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
199
Police Station
Jalgaon Jamod
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sumitra Vijay Rajput
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod
Disposed
B.W._Unready
Appearance
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-12-2025 | B.W._Unready |
| 08-09-2025 | Appearance |
| 14-05-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalgaon Jamod, discharged accused Sumitra in a prosecution under Section 65-e of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing the accused's prolonged absence and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple summons and bail warrants. The court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita due to the case's indefinite pendency and lack of substantive progress, and ordered the seized 12 liters of hand-made liquor to be disposed by the Excise Department after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalgaon Jamod, discharged accused Sumitra in a prosecution under Section 65-e of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing the accused's prolonged absence and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple summons and bail warrants. The court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita due to the case's indefinite pendency and lack of substantive progress, and ordered the seized 12 liters of hand-made liquor to be disposed by the Excise Department after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts