State of Maharashtra vs Pratik Bramhadeo Gomase — 220/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU090005212025

Filing Number

405/2025

Filing Date

22-Apr-2025

Registration No

220/2025

Registration Date

22-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jalgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

189

Police Station

Jalgaon Jamod

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pratik Bramhadeo Gomase

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The court discharged the accused Pratik in a liquor prohibition case after finding the prosecution failed to secure his presence despite multiple summons and bench warrants over a prolonged period, and critical evidence (C.A. report) was missing. The proceedings were stopped under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and the 10 seized bottles were ordered sent to the Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

  5. 24-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

  6. 12-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

  7. 23-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 22-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 220/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused Pratik in a liquor prohibition case after finding the prosecution failed to secure his presence despite multiple summons and bench warrants over a prolonged period, and critical evidence (C.A. report) was missing. The proceedings were stopped under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and the 10 seized bottles were ordered sent to the Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case