State of Maharashtra vs Jangalsing Supda Rathod — 136/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU090003182025

Filing Number

248/2025

Filing Date

10-Mar-2025

Registration No

136/2025

Registration Date

10-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jalgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

557

Police Station

Jalgaon Jamod

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jangalsing Supda Rathod

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Summary The court discharged the accused Jangalsing in a liquor prohibition case (Section 65-e, Bombay Prohibition Act) due to the accused's prolonged absence and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple summons and bench warrants issued over time. The proceedings were stopped under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and six bottles of seized country liquor were ordered sent to the Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

  5. 30-Oct-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod

  6. 25-Jun-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Ja.

  7. 12-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 136/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court discharged the accused Jangalsing in a liquor prohibition case (Section 65-e, Bombay Prohibition Act) due to the accused's prolonged absence and the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple summons and bench warrants issued over time. The proceedings were stopped under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and six bottles of seized country liquor were ordered sent to the Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case