Ganesh Shaligram Ingle and 01 vs The Chief Officer and 04 Advocate - Giri NH — 7/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHBU090002092019
Filing Number
22/2019
Filing Date
27-02-2019
Registration No
7/2019
Registration Date
27-02-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jalgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Shaligram Ingle and 01
Adv. Khan AA
Subhash Shaligram Ingle
Adv. Khan AA
Respondent(s)
The Chief Officer and 04 Advocate - Giri NH
Assstt. Engineer
Adv. Nirmal k s
Executive Engiineer
Adv. Nirmal K S
Supdt. Engineer
Godawari Rampuri Gosavi
Adv. Giri NH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C. Jalgaon Jamod
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY The Civil Judge dismissed the plaintiffs' suit seeking declaration of ownership, possession recovery, and damages regarding a disputed property portion. The court found the suit not maintainable in its present form as it failed to properly identify the disputed property, was barred by limitation (plaintiffs knew of boundaries since 1993 but filed suit in 2019), and the plaintiffs did not prove exclusive ownership or that defendants illegally encroached on their property. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The Civil Judge dismissed the plaintiffs' suit seeking declaration of ownership, possession recovery, and damages regarding a disputed property portion. The court found the suit not maintainable in its present form as it failed to properly identify the disputed property, was barred by limitation (plaintiffs knew of boundaries since 1993 but filed suit in 2019), and the plaintiffs did not prove exclusive ownership or that defendants illegally encroached on their property. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts