Sarangdhar Shriram Pivalatkar vs nil — 329/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.
M.J.Cases
CNR: MHBU080017682025
e-Filing Number
19-12-2025
Filing Number
441/2025
Filing Date
22-Dec-2025
Registration No
329/2025
Registration Date
22-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , nandura
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sarangdhar Shriram Pivalatkar
Adv. JANGALE SUNIL KAILAS
-
2.Nalu Rajesh Pivalatkar
Adv. JANGALE SUNIL KAILAS
-
3.Avinash Raju Pivalatkar
Adv. JANGALE SUNIL KAILAS
-
4.Sagar Rajesh Pivalatkar
Adv. JANGALE SUNIL KAILAS
-
5.Marabai Samadhan Kandelkar
Adv. JANGALE SUNIL KAILAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.nil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted the heirship certificate application filed by five applicants (son, daughter-in-law, two grandsons, and daughter) of deceased Shriram Sugdeo Pivalatkar under the Bombay Regulations, 1827. The court found the applicants were the sole surviving legal heirs, supported by death certificates and unchallenged evidence, and noted that no objections were raised despite public notice publication. The certificate formally recognizes their status as legal heirs but does not confer property transfer rights by itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
-
09-Mar-2026
Compliance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
-
24-Feb-2026
Compliance
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
-
16-Feb-2026
Proclomation
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
-
01-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 329/2025
The court granted the heirship certificate application filed by five applicants (son, daughter-in-law, two grandsons, and daughter) of deceased Shriram Sugdeo Pivalatkar under the Bombay Regulations, 1827. The court found the applicants were the sole surviving legal heirs, supported by death certificates and unchallenged evidence, and noted that no objections were raised despite public notice publication. The certificate formally recognizes their status as legal heirs but does not confer property transfer rights by itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts