Sulochana Ramkrishna Khavale vs Nil — 313/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.

M.J.Cases

CNR: MHBU080016972025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-12-2025

Filing Number

420/2025

Filing Date

10-12-2025

Registration No

313/2025

Registration Date

10-12-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , nandura

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Sulochana Ramkrishna Khavale

Adv. SAGAR BHARAT SURYAVANSHI

Vikas Ramkrishna Khavale

Adv. SAGAR BHARAT SURYAVANSHI

Nayna J Pavan Wagh

Adv. SAGAR BHARAT SURYAVANSHI

Respondent(s)

Nil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

11-03-2026

Disposed

03-02-2026

Compliance

16-12-2025

Proclomation

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the application and issued a heirship certificate formally recognizing Sulochana (widow), applicant No.2 (son), and applicant No.3 (daughter) as legal heirs of deceased Ramkrushna Baburao Khawale, based on the death certificate, affidavit evidence, and the absence of any objections after public notice. The court clarified that the certificate merely provides formal recognition of their existing heir status for administrative convenience and does not confer property rights by itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application and issued a heirship certificate formally recognizing Sulochana (widow), applicant No.2 (son), and applicant No.3 (daughter) as legal heirs of deceased Ramkrushna Baburao Khawale, based on the death certificate, affidavit evidence, and the absence of any objections after public notice. The court clarified that the certificate merely provides formal recognition of their existing heir status for administrative convenience and does not confer property rights by itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , nandura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case