State (Pso Nandura) vs Sanjay Dipchand Nemade — 223/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU080005332025

Filing Number

340/2025

Filing Date

22-Apr-2025

Registration No

223/2025

Registration Date

22-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , nandura

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

558

Police Station

Nandura

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State (Pso Nandura)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Dipchand Nemade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, against accused Sanjay for an alleged alcohol prohibition offense due to the accused's continued absence despite warrant issuance and the investigating officer's failure to submit chemical analyzer reports substantiating the seized substance's alcoholic content. The accused was discharged, and seized property will be sent to the State Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

  4. 08-Dec-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

  5. 26-Nov-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

  6. 16-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

  7. 22-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 22-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 223/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, against accused Sanjay for an alleged alcohol prohibition offense due to the accused's continued absence despite warrant issuance and the investigating officer's failure to submit chemical analyzer reports substantiating the seized substance's alcoholic content. The accused was discharged, and seized property will be sent to the State Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case