Excise Department Malkapur vs Ganesh Dashrath Kokate Advocate - Brahmane SC — 223/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU080005132024
Filing Number
393/2024
Filing Date
16-Apr-2024
Registration No
223/2024
Registration Date
16-Apr-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , nandura
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Excise Department Malkapur
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ganesh Dashrath Kokate Advocate - Brahmane SC
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court stopped proceedings against accused Ganesh under Section 258 of the CrPC in an alcohol prohibition case, citing the accused's prolonged absence despite warrant issuance and the investigating officer's failure to file a chemical analyzer report to prove the seized substance contained alcohol. The accused was discharged, with seized property to be disposed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
-
29-Dec-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
-
29-Sep-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
-
18-Aug-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
-
09-May-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Nandura
-
10-Mar-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Nandura
-
22-Jan-2025
Order
Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Nandura
-
19-Oct-2024
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Nandura
-
11-Jul-2024
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Nandura
-
16-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 223/2024
The court stopped proceedings against accused Ganesh under Section 258 of the CrPC in an alcohol prohibition case, citing the accused's prolonged absence despite warrant issuance and the investigating officer's failure to file a chemical analyzer report to prove the seized substance contained alcohol. The accused was discharged, with seized property to be disposed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts