State (Pso Jalamb) vs Baliram Laxman Waghmare — 168/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU080003822025

Filing Number

257/2025

Filing Date

13-Mar-2025

Registration No

168/2025

Registration Date

13-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , nandura

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

Jalamb

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State (Pso Jalamb)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Baliram Laxman Waghmare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings against Baliram under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an alleged liquor offense under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The decision was based on the accused's continued absence despite warrant issuance and the investigating officer's failure to file the chemical analyzer report to prove the seized substance contained alcohol. The accused was discharged and seized property ordered for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

  4. 31-Dec-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

  5. 18-Sep-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

  6. 11-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Summons

  7. 13-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against Baliram under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an alleged liquor offense under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The decision was based on the accused's continued absence despite warrant issuance and the investigating officer's failure to file the chemical analyzer report to prove the seized substance contained alcohol. The accused was discharged and seized property ordered for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case