Arvind Shrikrushna Kulkarni vs Buldhana Cyber Police Station — 18/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 15th May 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHBU080002792026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

214/2026

Filing Date

07-02-2026

Registration No

18/2026

Registration Date

07-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , nandura

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Arvind Shrikrushna Kulkarni

Adv. VERULKAR NILESH MANOHAR

Respondent(s)

Buldhana Cyber Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

15-05-2026

Disposed

14-05-2026

Arguments

13-05-2026

Arguments

11-05-2026

Arguments

06-05-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

15-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court allowed the application of a 70-year-old retired bank officer (Arvind Kulkarni) who was defrauded of Rs. 2.01 crores in a cyber fraud scheme. The court directed the Cyber Police Station and banks to release Rs. 30,97,370.90 held in the crime case, upon the applicant executing an indemnity bond and depositing the amount with interest as directed by the court. The investigating officer and prosecution did not oppose the release, citing the applicant's documented victim status and severe financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the application of a 70-year-old retired bank officer (Arvind Kulkarni) who was defrauded of Rs. 2.01 crores in a cyber fraud scheme. The court directed the Cyber Police Station and banks to release Rs. 30,97,370.90 held in the crime case, upon the applicant executing an indemnity bond and depositing the amount with interest as directed by the court. The investigating officer and prosecution did not oppose the release, citing the applicant's documented victim status and severe financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , nandura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case