Gopal Haribhau Hivale vs Shrikrushna Devrao Hivale — 8/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHBU080002122023

Evidence

Next Hearing

08th July 2026

Filing Number

46/2023

Filing Date

07-02-2023

Registration No

8/2023

Registration Date

07-02-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , nandura

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section CPC

Petitioner(s)

Gopal Haribhau Hivale

Adv. Bodwade PS

Respondent(s)

Shrikrushna Devrao Hivale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

04-05-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

08-01-2026

Evidence

13-11-2025

Evidence

08-10-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

06-04-2023
Order on T.I.

Summary: The temporary injunction application filed by the plaintiff was allowed. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case of ownership and possession of a 299 sq. feet property based on a registered Sale-Deed dated 19/11/1993, supported by Gram Panchayat records and government scheme allocation. The court restrained the defendant and all others from obstructing or disturbing the plaintiff's possession and construction on the property until final disposal of the suit, as the balance of convenience and irreparable loss factors favored the plaintiff's rights over the defendant's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The temporary injunction application filed by the plaintiff was allowed. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima facie case of ownership and possession of a 299 sq. feet property based on a registered Sale-Deed dated 19/11/1993, supported by Gram Panchayat records and government scheme allocation. The court restrained the defendant and all others from obstructing or disturbing the plaintiff's possession and construction on the property until final disposal of the suit, as the balance of convenience and irreparable loss factors favored the plaintiff's rights over the defendant's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , nandura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case