State (Pso Nandura) vs Satish Sanjay Mankar — 30/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU080000462025
Filing Number
36/2025
Filing Date
03-Jan-2025
Registration No
30/2025
Registration Date
03-Jan-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , nandura
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 20-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
566
Police Station
Nandura
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State (Pso Nandura)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Satish Sanjay Mankar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The Nandura Judicial Magistrate stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, against accused Satish in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case due to the accused's continued absence despite warrants, absence of chemical analyzer reports proving the seized substance was alcoholic, and futility of further proceedings. The accused was discharged and the seized property directed to the State Excise Department for disposal after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
-
02-Jan-2026
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
-
12-Sep-2025
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
-
18-Aug-2025
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
-
12-Jun-2025
Awaiting Summons
-
27-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint Civil Judge (Jr.D.) And JMFC, Nandura
-
03-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 30/2025
Summary The Nandura Judicial Magistrate stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, against accused Satish in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case due to the accused's continued absence despite warrants, absence of chemical analyzer reports proving the seized substance was alcoholic, and futility of further proceedings. The accused was discharged and the seized property directed to the State Excise Department for disposal after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts