State (Pso Nandura) vs Aananda Pandurang Gaygol — 27/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU080000432025

Case disposed

Filing Number

33/2025

Filing Date

03-01-2025

Registration No

27/2025

Registration Date

03-01-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , nandura

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

607

Police Station

Nandura

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

State (Pso Nandura)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Aananda Pandurang Gaygol

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura

11-03-2026

Disposed

02-01-2026

B.W._Unready

12-09-2025

B.W._Unready

18-08-2025

B.W._Unready

29-05-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Nandura Judicial Magistrate's Court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in an alcohol prohibition case against accused Ananda. The court found the case unviable due to the accused's prolonged absence despite warrants, the investigating officer's failure to submit chemical analyzer reports proving the seized substance was alcoholic, making conviction impossible. The accused was discharged, and seized property was directed to be sent to the State Excise Department for disposal, with case records retained for potential future reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Nandura Judicial Magistrate's Court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in an alcohol prohibition case against accused Ananda. The court found the case unviable due to the accused's prolonged absence despite warrants, the investigating officer's failure to submit chemical analyzer reports proving the seized substance was alcoholic, making conviction impossible. The accused was discharged, and seized property was directed to be sent to the State Excise Department for disposal, with case records retained for potential future reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , nandura All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case