State (Pso Nandura) vs Aananda Pandurang Gaygol — 27/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU080000432025
Filing Number
33/2025
Filing Date
03-01-2025
Registration No
27/2025
Registration Date
03-01-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , nandura
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
607
Police Station
Nandura
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State (Pso Nandura)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Aananda Pandurang Gaygol
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Nandura
Disposed
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-01-2026 | B.W._Unready |
| 12-09-2025 | B.W._Unready |
| 18-08-2025 | B.W._Unready |
| 29-05-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Nandura Judicial Magistrate's Court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in an alcohol prohibition case against accused Ananda. The court found the case unviable due to the accused's prolonged absence despite warrants, the investigating officer's failure to submit chemical analyzer reports proving the seized substance was alcoholic, making conviction impossible. The accused was discharged, and seized property was directed to be sent to the State Excise Department for disposal, with case records retained for potential future reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Nandura Judicial Magistrate's Court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in an alcohol prohibition case against accused Ananda. The court found the case unviable due to the accused's prolonged absence despite warrants, the investigating officer's failure to submit chemical analyzer reports proving the seized substance was alcoholic, making conviction impossible. The accused was discharged, and seized property was directed to be sent to the State Excise Department for disposal, with case records retained for potential future reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts