State of Maharashtra PSO Shegaon City vs Sk. Ahmad Sk. Samad Advocate - Deshmukh CB — 371/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305, 331(3), 331(4), 3(5). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHBU070027642025
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
Filing Number
2275/2025
Filing Date
19-11-2025
Registration No
371/2025
Registration Date
19-11-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Shegaon.
FIR Details
FIR Number
114
Police Station
Shegaon
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra PSO Shegaon City
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sk. Ahmad Sk. Samad Advocate - Deshmukh CB
Saiyyad Shakil Saiyyad Yusuf
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Shegaon.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary In this theft case (Nifou Kh Kr 371/2025), the court examined witness testimony from the complainant's wife regarding alleged burglary where approximately 2-2.5 lakh rupees worth of jewelry and household items were reported stolen. During cross-examination, the witness admitted to inconsistencies in her statement to police and acknowledged giving false testimony in court. The case appears to be in the evidentiary/testimonial stage with the witness examination completed on 13.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this theft case (Nifou Kh Kr 371/2025), the court examined witness testimony from the complainant's wife regarding alleged burglary where approximately 2-2.5 lakh rupees worth of jewelry and household items were reported stolen. During cross-examination, the witness admitted to inconsistencies in her statement to police and acknowledged giving false testimony in court. The case appears to be in the evidentiary/testimonial stage with the witness examination completed on 13.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts