State of Maharashtra PSO, Shegaon City vs Santosh Mauli Waghmare Advocate - Wakode AS — 280/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,498(A). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHBU070020432017
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
18556/2017
Filing Date
27-12-2017
Registration No
280/2017
Registration Date
27-12-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
419
Police Station
Shegaon
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra PSO, Shegaon City
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Santosh Mauli Waghmare Advocate - Wakode AS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 31-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Marathi court order (Case No. 280/2017) from a Sessions Court in Shegaon documenting the cross-examination testimony of Witness 3 in a criminal matter involving the State vs. Santosh Baghmari. The witness (the complainant) testified about allegations of dowry harassment, threats, and acid attack by the accused after marriage. At the conclusion, the court noted that the cross-examination was completed, no further cross-examination was required, and the witness statement was recorded. The petition was allowed and testimony was accepted into the record on April 15, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Marathi court order (Case No. 280/2017) from a Sessions Court in Shegaon documenting the cross-examination testimony of Witness 3 in a criminal matter involving the State vs. Santosh Baghmari. The witness (the complainant) testified about allegations of dowry harassment, threats, and acid attack by the accused after marriage. At the conclusion, the court noted that the cross-examination was completed, no further cross-examination was required, and the witness statement was recorded. The petition was allowed and testimony was accepted into the record on April 15, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts