Sachin Omprakash Dhanokar vs Rahul Devidas Choudhari Pro. Devansh Trading Company — 776/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU070014732023
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
1173/2023
Filing Date
04-08-2023
Registration No
776/2023
Registration Date
04-08-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sachin Omprakash Dhanokar
Adv. Mane PD
Respondent(s)
Rahul Devidas Choudhari Pro. Devansh Trading Company
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 24-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 25-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court issued process against the accused Rahul Chaudhari for the offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (dishonored cheque). The complaint filed by Sachin Dhanokar was found to be within the limitation period with a prima facie case made out against the accused, who had issued a cheque that was dishonored due to insufficient funds and failed to comply with demand notices. The case is returnable on 27.09.2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court issued process against the accused Rahul Chaudhari for the offense punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (dishonored cheque). The complaint filed by Sachin Dhanokar was found to be within the limitation period with a prima facie case made out against the accused, who had issued a cheque that was dishonored due to insufficient funds and failed to comply with demand notices. The case is returnable on 27.09.2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts