State of Maharashtra PSO, Shegaon City vs Vinod Kashiram Shegokar — 840/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU070011102021
Filing Number
1013/2021
Filing Date
25-Jun-2021
Registration No
840/2022
Registration Date
25-Jun-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
Last updated 20-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
245
Police Station
Shegaon
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra PSO, Shegaon City
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vinod Kashiram Shegokar
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
12-Aug-2025
N.B.W._Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
16-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
17-Feb-2025
EvidenceView PDF
Summary: In FIR No. 840/2022 (Government v. Vinod Shegokar), the Sessions Court at Shegaon recorded the examination of Witness No. 2 (Ambadas Hari Babulkar) on 17.02.2025. The witness testified that police did not take him to the crime scene, did not conduct any search in his presence, and denied signing any panchnama (seizure memo). The court accepted the witness's statement and noted that cross-examination by the accused's counsel was not conducted as the accused's advocate was absent and the accused had no questions for the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
30-Sep-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
26-Aug-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
29-Jul-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
05-Jun-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
08-Apr-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
11-Mar-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
19-Jan-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
27-Nov-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
25-Sep-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
23-Aug-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
17-Jul-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
01-Jun-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
24-Apr-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
20-Mar-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
03-Feb-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
20-Dec-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
02-Nov-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
29-Aug-2022
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
24-Jun-2022
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
10-May-2022
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
11-Feb-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
05-Oct-2021
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
-
25-Jun-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jun-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 840/2022
Summary: In FIR No. 840/2022 (Government v. Vinod Shegokar), the Sessions Court at Shegaon recorded the examination of Witness No. 2 (Ambadas Hari Babulkar) on 17.02.2025. The witness testified that police did not take him to the crime scene, did not conduct any search in his presence, and denied signing any panchnama (seizure memo). The court accepted the witness's statement and noted that cross-examination by the accused's counsel was not conducted as the accused's advocate was absent and the accused had no questions for the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts