State of Maha (Excise Dept,Shegaon) vs Bashar Shaha Raheman Shaha Advocate - Shegokar BS — 380/2022

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65d. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU070007932022

Case disposed

Filing Number

619/2022

Filing Date

27-05-2022

Registration No

380/2022

Registration Date

27-05-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Shegaon.

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

Excise office

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65d

Petitioner(s)

State of Maha (Excise Dept,Shegaon)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Bashar Shaha Raheman Shaha Advocate - Shegokar BS

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Shegaon.

11-03-2026

Disposed

20-01-2026

Evidence

28-10-2025

Evidence

11-08-2025

Evidence

11-06-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted accused Basher Shah of charges under Maharashtra Excise Act Section 65(D) and Indian Penal Code Section 278(1) for alleged illegal possession of 38 bottles of 90ml liquor intended for sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as crucial evidence—including the seized liquor sample and the witness who handled it—was not properly established in court, and no chemical analysis report was produced to confirm the nature of the seized substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted accused Basher Shah of charges under Maharashtra Excise Act Section 65(D) and Indian Penal Code Section 278(1) for alleged illegal possession of 38 bottles of 90ml liquor intended for sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as crucial evidence—including the seized liquor sample and the witness who handled it—was not properly established in court, and no chemical analysis report was produced to confirm the nature of the seized substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case