State of Maha (Excise Dept,Shegaon) vs Bashar Shaha Raheman Shaha Advocate - Shegokar BS — 380/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65d. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU070007932022
Filing Number
619/2022
Filing Date
27-05-2022
Registration No
380/2022
Registration Date
27-05-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Shegaon.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
Excise office
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maha (Excise Dept,Shegaon)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Bashar Shaha Raheman Shaha Advocate - Shegokar BS
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Shegaon.
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-10-2025 | Evidence |
| 11-08-2025 | Evidence |
| 11-06-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted accused Basher Shah of charges under Maharashtra Excise Act Section 65(D) and Indian Penal Code Section 278(1) for alleged illegal possession of 38 bottles of 90ml liquor intended for sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as crucial evidence—including the seized liquor sample and the witness who handled it—was not properly established in court, and no chemical analysis report was produced to confirm the nature of the seized substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted accused Basher Shah of charges under Maharashtra Excise Act Section 65(D) and Indian Penal Code Section 278(1) for alleged illegal possession of 38 bottles of 90ml liquor intended for sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as crucial evidence—including the seized liquor sample and the witness who handled it—was not properly established in court, and no chemical analysis report was produced to confirm the nature of the seized substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts