Prachi Nikunj Harlalka vs Nikunj Ramakant Harlalka — 42/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125(3). Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHBU070007462025

Depositing Amount

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

26-03-2025

Filing Number

578/2025

Filing Date

03-04-2025

Registration No

42/2025

Registration Date

03-04-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Shegaon.

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125(3)

Petitioner(s)

Prachi Nikunj Harlalka

Adv. Bhaltadak GR

Advit Nikunj Harlalka

Adv. BHALTADAK GANESH RAMBHAU

Sashmit Nikunj Harlalka

Adv. BHALTADAK GANESH RAMBHAU

Respondent(s)

Nikunj Ramakant Harlalka

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Shegaon.

14-05-2026

Depositing Amount

23-04-2026

Depositing Amount

02-04-2026

Depositing Amount

12-03-2026

Depositing Amount

11-03-2026

Depositing Amount

Interim Orders

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The distress warrant issued against the non-applicant (Nikunj Harlalka) in a domestic violence maintenance case is cancelled. The court found that while outstanding maintenance amounts of Rs. 71 lakhs and Rs. 51 lakhs remain across two proceedings, the non-applicant has demonstrated good faith by depositing Rs. 6 lakhs within 15 days and presenting cheques for Rs. 50,000 in each proceeding. Relying on Supreme Court precedent that DV Act proceedings are civil in nature and designed for relief rather than punishment, the court cancelled the warrant on the condition that the non-applicant pay the maximum outstanding amount without fail on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The distress warrant issued against the non-applicant (Nikunj Harlalka) in a domestic violence maintenance case is cancelled. The court found that while outstanding maintenance amounts of Rs. 71 lakhs and Rs. 51 lakhs remain across two proceedings, the non-applicant has demonstrated good faith by depositing Rs. 6 lakhs within 15 days and presenting cheques for Rs. 50,000 in each proceeding. Relying on Supreme Court precedent that DV Act proceedings are civil in nature and designed for relief rather than punishment, the court cancelled the warrant on the condition that the non-applicant pay the maximum outstanding amount without fail on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case