Prachi Nikunj Harlalka vs Nikunj Ramakant Harlalka — 42/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125(3). Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHBU070007462025
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
26-03-2025
Filing Number
578/2025
Filing Date
03-04-2025
Registration No
42/2025
Registration Date
03-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Shegaon.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prachi Nikunj Harlalka
Adv. Bhaltadak GR
Advit Nikunj Harlalka
Adv. BHALTADAK GANESH RAMBHAU
Sashmit Nikunj Harlalka
Adv. BHALTADAK GANESH RAMBHAU
Respondent(s)
Nikunj Ramakant Harlalka
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Shegaon.
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 23-04-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 02-04-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 12-03-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 11-03-2026 | Depositing Amount |
Interim Orders
Summary: The distress warrant issued against the non-applicant (Nikunj Harlalka) in a domestic violence maintenance case is cancelled. The court found that while outstanding maintenance amounts of Rs. 71 lakhs and Rs. 51 lakhs remain across two proceedings, the non-applicant has demonstrated good faith by depositing Rs. 6 lakhs within 15 days and presenting cheques for Rs. 50,000 in each proceeding. Relying on Supreme Court precedent that DV Act proceedings are civil in nature and designed for relief rather than punishment, the court cancelled the warrant on the condition that the non-applicant pay the maximum outstanding amount without fail on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The distress warrant issued against the non-applicant (Nikunj Harlalka) in a domestic violence maintenance case is cancelled. The court found that while outstanding maintenance amounts of Rs. 71 lakhs and Rs. 51 lakhs remain across two proceedings, the non-applicant has demonstrated good faith by depositing Rs. 6 lakhs within 15 days and presenting cheques for Rs. 50,000 in each proceeding. Relying on Supreme Court precedent that DV Act proceedings are civil in nature and designed for relief rather than punishment, the court cancelled the warrant on the condition that the non-applicant pay the maximum outstanding amount without fail on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts