Yashwant Rustamrao Deshmukh vs Vinod Sarangdhar Kale Advocate - Talnikar BP — 485/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE on 29th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU070006922018
Filing Number
636/2018
Filing Date
23-04-2018
Registration No
485/2018
Registration Date
23-04-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yashwant Rustamrao Deshmukh
Adv. Banarase AS
Respondent(s)
Vinod Sarangdhar Kale Advocate - Talnikar BP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court disposed of the cheque bounce case (Section 138 of N.I. Act) after the complainant Yashwant Deshmukh received Rs. 1,50,000 and filed a withdrawal petition. The accused Vinod Kale was acquitted under Section 257 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as the complainant chose not to proceed further with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court disposed of the cheque bounce case (Section 138 of N.I. Act) after the complainant Yashwant Deshmukh received Rs. 1,50,000 and filed a withdrawal petition. The accused Vinod Kale was acquitted under Section 257 of the Criminal Procedure Code, as the complainant chose not to proceed further with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts