Aasha Avadhut Kathole vs Sushila Digamber Kathole Advocate - Dhanokar PK — 14/2024

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for a temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from disturbing their possession of ancestral property in Buldhana district. The court found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as they were aware of the 2015 will deed (evidenced by their 2020 mutation objection) yet claimed first learning of it in 2024, and could not demonstrate actual possession of the suit property. The registered will deed in defendants' favor carries presumption of validity under law, placing the burden on plaintiffs to prove otherwise through trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.