Kishore Namdeorao Patil Through POA Dhirajkumar Rampalsingh vs State of Maharashtra PSO Shegaon City — 16/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHBU070005262026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
406/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
16/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kishore Namdeorao Patil Through POA Dhirajkumar Rampalsingh
Adv. Bramhane BU
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra PSO Shegaon City
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Order |
| 09-03-2026 | Order |
| 05-03-2026 | Order |
| 02-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shegaon, allowed the application under Section 503 of BNSS and ordered release of a seized Hyundai Ester vehicle and golden articles to the applicant (owner) on supurdnama (custody with conditions). The court found that keeping the vehicle unattended at the police station risked damage and held that safeguarding through imposed conditions—including an indemnity bond of Rs. 10 lakhs, prohibition on sale/transfer, and photographic documentation by the investigating officer—adequately protected prosecution interests while serving justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shegaon, allowed the application under Section 503 of BNSS and ordered release of a seized Hyundai Ester vehicle and golden articles to the applicant (owner) on supurdnama (custody with conditions). The court found that keeping the vehicle unattended at the police station risked damage and held that safeguarding through imposed conditions—including an indemnity bond of Rs. 10 lakhs, prohibition on sale/transfer, and photographic documentation by the investigating officer—adequately protected prosecution interests while serving justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts