Kishore Namdeorao Patil Through POA Dhirajkumar Rampalsingh vs State of Maharashtra PSO Shegaon City — 16/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHBU070005262026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

406/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Kishore Namdeorao Patil Through POA Dhirajkumar Rampalsingh

Adv. Bramhane BU

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra PSO Shegaon City

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon

16-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Order

09-03-2026

Order

05-03-2026

Order

02-03-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shegaon, allowed the application under Section 503 of BNSS and ordered release of a seized Hyundai Ester vehicle and golden articles to the applicant (owner) on supurdnama (custody with conditions). The court found that keeping the vehicle unattended at the police station risked damage and held that safeguarding through imposed conditions—including an indemnity bond of Rs. 10 lakhs, prohibition on sale/transfer, and photographic documentation by the investigating officer—adequately protected prosecution interests while serving justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shegaon, allowed the application under Section 503 of BNSS and ordered release of a seized Hyundai Ester vehicle and golden articles to the applicant (owner) on supurdnama (custody with conditions). The court found that keeping the vehicle unattended at the police station risked damage and held that safeguarding through imposed conditions—including an indemnity bond of Rs. 10 lakhs, prohibition on sale/transfer, and photographic documentation by the investigating officer—adequately protected prosecution interests while serving justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case