State of Maharashtra, PSO, Jalamb vs Wajjiruddin Ajjiruddin @ Sk. Kalim Advocate - Wankhade SG — 75/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHBU070004422019
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
385/2019
Filing Date
13-03-2019
Registration No
75/2019
Registration Date
13-03-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
182
Police Station
Jalamb
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra, PSO, Jalamb
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Wajjiruddin Ajjiruddin @ Sk. Kalim Advocate - Wankhade SG
Shubham Arun Sabe
Adv. Wankhade SG
Arun Narayna Sabe
Adv. Wankhade SG
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 29-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document records the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of Government Witness No. 03 (Afroze Khan) in criminal case No. 75/2019 before the Sessions Court, Shegaon. The witness testified regarding the spot panchanama and seizure panchanama conducted on 28.11.2018, identifying seized items including a Tata 407 vehicle and confirming the documents were prepared in his presence. Cross-examination by the accused's counsel is noted as permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of Government Witness No. 03 (Afroze Khan) in criminal case No. 75/2019 before the Sessions Court, Shegaon. The witness testified regarding the spot panchanama and seizure panchanama conducted on 28.11.2018, identifying seized items including a Tata 407 vehicle and confirming the documents were prepared in his presence. Cross-examination by the accused's counsel is noted as permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts