State of Maharashtra PSO Shegaon Rural vs Sachin Raghunath Wankhade Advocate - Bramhane BU — 239/2020
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12 A. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU070004202020
Filing Number
371/2020
Filing Date
28-02-2020
Registration No
239/2020
Registration Date
28-02-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
Shegaon
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra PSO Shegaon Rural
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sachin Raghunath Wankhade Advocate - Bramhane BU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
Disposed
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 17-02-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 03-01-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 21-11-2025 | N.B.W._Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged the accused Sachin Raghunath Wankhade of gambling charges under the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, reasoning that despite an unserved non-bailable warrant issued since September 2022, the prosecution had failed to secure his presence over six years. The seized gambling materials (dot pen and chit) were ordered destroyed and ₹370 seized cash credited to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged the accused Sachin Raghunath Wankhade of gambling charges under the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, reasoning that despite an unserved non-bailable warrant issued since September 2022, the prosecution had failed to secure his presence over six years. The seized gambling materials (dot pen and chit) were ordered destroyed and ₹370 seized cash credited to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts