State of Maharashtra vs Sk. Nasir Sk. Rafique Advocate - Shaikh TA — 800062/2005
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380. Status: Dormant File. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHBU070003382005
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
Filing Number
800062/2005
Filing Date
07-06-2005
Registration No
800062/2005
Registration Date
07-06-2005
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
Shegaon
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sk. Nasir Sk. Rafique Advocate - Shaikh TA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Shegaon
Dormant File
Dormant File
Dormant File
Dormant File
Dormant File
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Dormant File |
| 23-04-2026 | Dormant File |
| 08-04-2026 | Dormant File |
| 27-03-2026 | Dormant File |
| 16-03-2026 | Dormant File |
Interim Orders
This is a witness deposition record (under CrPC Section 299) in Criminal Case No. 62/2005 (Government v. Sheikh Nasir) from Shegaon Court, dated 08.04.2026. Witness Sanjay Narayana Kadam testifies regarding seizure of items from the accused on 19.03.2005, including a black book with 50 grams of yellow metal, Rs. 135 cash, and a lemon, as well as metal items seized from the complainant, with seizure panchnamas prepared and signed accordingly. The witness explicitly admits during cross-examination that he is providing false testimony to protect the accused from punishment, and acknowledges having no personal knowledge of the case facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness deposition record (under CrPC Section 299) in Criminal Case No. 62/2005 (Government v. Sheikh Nasir) from Shegaon Court, dated 08.04.2026. Witness Sanjay Narayana Kadam testifies regarding seizure of items from the accused on 19.03.2005, including a black book with 50 grams of yellow metal, Rs. 135 cash, and a lemon, as well as metal items seized from the complainant, with seizure panchnamas prepared and signed accordingly. The witness explicitly admits during cross-examination that he is providing false testimony to protect the accused from punishment, and acknowledges having no personal knowledge of the case facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts