Anandrao Mahadevrao Pimpalkar vs Nil — 8/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2(1). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 05th May 2026.

Civil M.A.

CNR: MHBU070000742026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

14/2026

Filing Date

07-01-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

07-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Shegaon.

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2(1)

Petitioner(s)

Anandrao Mahadevrao Pimpalkar

Adv. Lahulkar B.M

Kausalya Janardhan Wankhade

Adv. Lahulkar B.M

Panchfula Vasantrav Umbarkar

Adv. Lahulkar B.M

Rukhmabai Bramhadev Pimpalkar

Adv. Lahulkar B.M

Ramesh Bramhdev Pimpalkar

Adv. Lahulkar B.M

Suresh Bramhadev Pimpalkar

Adv. Lahulkar B.M

Ujwala Raju Wathulkar

Adv. Lahulkar B.M

Respondent(s)

Nil

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Shegaon.

05-05-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

Hearing

24-04-2026

Hearing

11-03-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

24-02-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Jt. Civil Judge at Shegaon granted a legal heirship certificate to seven applicants (children, daughter-in-law, and grandchildren) recognizing them as legal heirs of deceased Mahadeorao Yadoji Pimpalkar and Gayabai Mahadeo Pimpalkar under the Bombay Regulation Act VIII of 1827. The court found sufficient documentary evidence (death certificates, Aadhar cards, municipal certificates) and unopposed public notice to support the applicants' claims, though the certificate was restricted from being used for property mutation purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Jt. Civil Judge at Shegaon granted a legal heirship certificate to seven applicants (children, daughter-in-law, and grandchildren) recognizing them as legal heirs of deceased Mahadeorao Yadoji Pimpalkar and Gayabai Mahadeo Pimpalkar under the Bombay Regulation Act VIII of 1827. The court found sufficient documentary evidence (death certificates, Aadhar cards, municipal certificates) and unopposed public notice to support the applicants' claims, though the certificate was restricted from being used for property mutation purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , shegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case