State of Maharashtra. vs Bandu Shamrao Talware — 2031/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 e. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU060030582023

Filing Number

3057/2023

Filing Date

27-Dec-2023

Registration No

2031/2023

Registration Date

27-Dec-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , khamgaon

Judge

2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

443

Police Station

Khamgaon Rural Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bandu Shamrao Talware

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The court stopped proceedings against accused Bandu Talware under Section 258 CrPC and discharged him from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing a 3-year-old case with no Competency Assessment report filed and insufficient prosecutorial efforts to examine witnesses or secure the accused's presence. The court found it fruitless to continue proceedings as part of the High Court's special drive to reduce case pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon

  5. 27-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon

  6. 19-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon

  7. 12-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon

  8. 02-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2031/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against accused Bandu Talware under Section 258 CrPC and discharged him from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing a 3-year-old case with no Competency Assessment report filed and insufficient prosecutorial efforts to examine witnesses or secure the accused's presence. The court found it fruitless to continue proceedings as part of the High Court's special drive to reduce case pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case