State of Maharashtra. vs Shaikh Arif Shaikh Mustak Advocate - Mohammad Arshad — 486/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHBU060022852024
Filing Number
2285/2024
Filing Date
21-10-2024
Registration No
486/2024
Registration Date
21-10-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , khamgaon
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.M.F.C., Khamgaon
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
329
Police Station
Khamgaon City Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Shaikh Arif Shaikh Mustak Advocate - Mohammad Arshad
Jarinabi Shaikh Mustak
Nasarin Parvin Shaikh Mutak
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.M.F.C., Khamgaon
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgment |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 26-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The court acquitted all three accused (Sheikh Aasif Sheikh Mustak, Jarinabi Sheikh Mustak, and Nasirin Purvin Sheikh Mustak) of charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, 506 (Part 2) read with section 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant turned hostile during examination and the key prosecution witnesses (crime scene panch witness and investigating officer) retracted their statements, rendering the prosecution's case insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court acquitted all three accused (Sheikh Aasif Sheikh Mustak, Jarinabi Sheikh Mustak, and Nasirin Purvin Sheikh Mustak) of charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, 506 (Part 2) read with section 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant turned hostile during examination and the key prosecution witnesses (crime scene panch witness and investigating officer) retracted their statements, rendering the prosecution's case insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts