State of Maharashtra. vs Swarup Digambar Chavan — 695/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 e. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU060015032022
Filing Number
1496/2022
Filing Date
29-Jun-2022
Registration No
695/2022
Registration Date
29-Jun-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , khamgaon
Judge
2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Swarup Digambar Chavan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Swarup Chavan under Section 258 of the CrPC, stopping proceedings for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found the case (pending 4 years) unfruitful as prosecution failed to file a Chargesheet and Arrest Report, secure the accused's presence, or examine witnesses despite opportunities, making further proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon
-
10-Mar-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon
-
30-Jan-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon
-
05-May-2025
Appearance
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon
-
30-Jan-2025
Appearance
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon
-
30-Jan-2024
Appearance
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon
-
27-Jul-2023
Appearance
Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.m.f.c., Khamgaon
-
29-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 695/2022
The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Swarup Chavan under Section 258 of the CrPC, stopping proceedings for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found the case (pending 4 years) unfruitful as prosecution failed to file a Chargesheet and Arrest Report, secure the accused's presence, or examine witnesses despite opportunities, making further proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts