State of Maharashtra. vs Eknath Bhimrao Solanke — 906/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 e. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU060013092023

Case disposed

Filing Number

1309/2023

Filing Date

29-05-2023

Registration No

906/2023

Registration Date

29-05-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , khamgaon

Judge

2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.M.F.C., Khamgaon

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

641

Police Station

Khamgaon City Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 e

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra.

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Eknath Bhimrao Solanke

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and J.M.F.C., Khamgaon

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Appearance

30-01-2026

Appearance

30-06-2025

Appearance

30-01-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate of Khamgaon discharged accused Eknath Solanke from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC. The court found the 3-year-old case unfruitful due to prosecution's failure to file a Competency Assessment (C.A.) report, secure the accused's presence, or examine witnesses despite opportunities, making further proceedings futile. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and perishable property ordered destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate of Khamgaon discharged accused Eknath Solanke from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC. The court found the 3-year-old case unfruitful due to prosecution's failure to file a Competency Assessment (C.A.) report, secure the accused's presence, or examine witnesses despite opportunities, making further proceedings futile. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and perishable property ordered destroyed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , khamgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case