State of Maharashtra vs Ishrat Jumma Jamulkar — 181/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,64(2)(i),78,351(2),351(3),352,333. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Spl.Case

CNR: MHBU040015342025

Evidence

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

e-Filing Number

20-11-2025

Filing Number

1050/2025

Filing Date

19-11-2025

Registration No

181/2025

Registration Date

19-11-2025

Court

District and Session Court ,khamgaon

Judge

4-Adhoc DJ - 1 AND A.S.J., Khamgaon

FIR Details

FIR Number

238

Police Station

Sonala

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,64(2)(i),78,351(2),351(3),352,333
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,8,10,12

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Ishrat Jumma Jamulkar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Adhoc DJ - 1 AND A.S.J., Khamgaon

24-03-2026

Evidence

17-03-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Evidence

11-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

14-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Bail Application Rejected: The Special Judge at Khamgaon court rejected the bail application of Ishrat Jumma Jamulkar, accused of sexually assaulting a minor on 13/09/2025, photographing the assault, and threatening to kill the victim if she disclosed the incident. The court found sufficient corroborating evidence in the charge-sheet and victim's statement, noting the severe nature of offences punishable up to life imprisonment, and determined the accused's grounds for bail were not justifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Bail Application Rejected: The Special Judge at Khamgaon court rejected the bail application of Ishrat Jumma Jamulkar, accused of sexually assaulting a minor on 13/09/2025, photographing the assault, and threatening to kill the victim if she disclosed the incident. The court found sufficient corroborating evidence in the charge-sheet and victim's statement, noting the severe nature of offences punishable up to life imprisonment, and determined the accused's grounds for bail were not justifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court ,khamgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case