Kailash Kanhaiyalal Kashelani vs Prakash Kisanchand Raolani Advocate - Mishra KV — 46/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Paper Book. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.A. - Civil Appeal
CNR: MHBU040012432019
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
648/2019
Filing Date
14-08-2019
Registration No
46/2019
Registration Date
14-08-2019
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
3-Adhoc DJ - 2 and A.S.J., Khamgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kailash Kanhaiyalal Kashelani
Adv. Bhaiyya PG
Sunil Kanhaiyalal Kashelani
Respondent(s)
Prakash Kisanchand Raolani Advocate - Mishra KV
Usha Kailash Sharma
Shankar Liladhar Bhutada
Ms. Rajeshwar Developers and Builders Through its Partner Shankarlal Liladhar Bhutada
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Adhoc DJ - 2 and A.S.J., Khamgaon
Paper Book
Paper Book
Payment of Paper Book Charges
Payment of Paper Book Charges
Payment of Paper Book Charges
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Paper Book |
| 11-03-2026 | Paper Book |
| 18-02-2026 | Payment of Paper Book Charges |
| 13-01-2026 | Payment of Paper Book Charges |
| 16-12-2025 | Payment of Paper Book Charges |
Interim Orders
Summary: The appellants' application to stay execution of a perpetual injunction decree was rejected. The court found no merit in the stay application, noting that the injunction has been in effect since 2013 and granting a stay would essentially allow the appellants to disturb the respondents' peaceful possession of the suit property. The court determined that allowing the stay would implicitly amount to allowing the appeal itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The appellants' application to stay execution of a perpetual injunction decree was rejected. The court found no merit in the stay application, noting that the injunction has been in effect since 2013 and granting a stay would essentially allow the appellants to disturb the respondents' peaceful possession of the suit property. The court determined that allowing the stay would implicitly amount to allowing the appeal itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts