State of Maharashtra vs Mangesh Anil Mali Advocate - Gawande SD — 77/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,326,323,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
Spl.Case
CNR: MHBU040011572022
Filing Number
726/2022
Filing Date
12-09-2022
Registration No
77/2022
Registration Date
12-09-2022
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
196
Police Station
Pimpalgaon Raja
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Ingle SB
Respondent(s)
Mangesh Anil Mali Advocate - Gawande SD
Durgesh Anil Mali
Adv. Gawande SD
Ganesh Anil Mali
Adv. Gawande SD
Akash Gopal Mali
Adv. Gawande SD
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Special Court under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 at Khamgaon acquitted all four accused (Mangesh Anil Mali, Durgesh Anil Mali, Ganesh Anil Mali, and Akash Gopal Mali) on May 6, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove charges under IPC sections 326, 323, 324, 506 and the SC/ST PoA Act; the prosecution's three witnesses failed to substantiate the allegations of assault and caste-based verbal abuse allegedly committed against the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Special Court under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 at Khamgaon acquitted all four accused (Mangesh Anil Mali, Durgesh Anil Mali, Ganesh Anil Mali, and Akash Gopal Mali) on May 6, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove charges under IPC sections 326, 323, 324, 506 and the SC/ST PoA Act; the prosecution's three witnesses failed to substantiate the allegations of assault and caste-based verbal abuse allegedly committed against the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts